Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with non-reversal of an emergency stoma

From: Stoma reversal after emergency stoma formation—the importance of timing: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study

Univariate analysis

Multi-variate analysis

Variable

p-value

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Adjusted Odds Ratio

95% CI

Age

0.009

1.024

(1.006–1.043)

 < 0.001

1.032

(1.016–1.048)

Sex (Male v Female)

0.998

1.001

(0.627–1.596)

   

Deprivation1

0.049

1.718

(1.001–3.150)

0.020

2.119

(1.127–3.985)

Immuno-suppressed

0.005

2.507

(1.314–4.784)

 < 0.001

2.677

(1.494–4.795)

CVD

0.695

0.899

(0.527–1.532)

   

Diabetes

0.807

1.089

(0.549–2.163)

   

Respiratory disease

0.767

0.919

(0.526 -1.606)

   

Smoker

0.439

1.142

(0.544–2.398)

   

ASA ≥ 3

 < 0.001

2.740

(1.503–4.994)

0.006

2.405

(1.285–4.500)

BMI

0.321

0.981

(0.945–1.019)

   

Malignancy

0.048

1.645

(1.005–2.693)

0.070

1.671

(0.958–2.914)

Adjuvant treatment

0.353

1.570

(0.606–4.068)

   

Frailty2

0.002

1.902

(1.214–2.981)

0.003

2.029

(1.275–3.227)

Colostomy v ileostomy

0.205

0.733

(0.454–1.185)

   
  1. Bold indicates p-value < 0.05; CI = Confidence Interval; BMI = Body Mass Index; SIMD = Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
  2. 1–Most deprived SIMD quintile (SIMD 1) compared to least deprived SIMD quintile (SIMD 5);
  3. 2–Frailty as indicated by a score of > 4 of the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale