Skip to main content

Table 4 Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for factors associated with delayed time to stoma reversal

From: Stoma reversal after emergency stoma formation—the importance of timing: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study

Univariate analysis

Multi-variate analysis

Factor

p-value

HR

95% CI

p-value

Adjusted HR

95% CI

Age

0.702

0.99

(0.98–1.02)

   

Sex (Male v female)

0.028

0.83

(0.70–0.98)

0.032

0.69

(0.49–0.97)

Deprivation1

0.477

0.84

(0.53–1.35)

   

Immuno-suppressed

0.095

0.70

(0.46–1.06)

   

CVD

0.307

0.91

(0.77–1.09)

   

Diabetes

0.617

0.94

(0.73–1.21)

   

Respiratory disease

0.784

1.03

(0.85–1.23)

   

Smoker

0.683

1.08

(0.75–1.57)

   

ASA ≥ 3

0.484

0.91

(0.70–1.18)

   

BMI

0.043

1.03

(1.00–1.07)

0.076

1.03

(0.99–1.06)

Malignancy

0.330

1.11

(0.90–1.36)

   

Adjuvant treatment

0.003

0.31

(0.14–0.66)

0.010

0.36

(0.17–0.78)

Frailty2

0.737

0.93

(0.59–1.45)

   

Colostomy v ileostomy

0.355

0.85

(0.61–1.20)

   

Length of stay (index procedure)

0.670

1.00

(0.99–1.01)

   

30-day morbidity (index procedure)

0.415

1.15

(0.82–1.61)

   

CD ≥ 3 (index procedure)

0.839

1.02

(0.84–1.24)

   
  1. Bold indicates p-value < 0.05; CI = Confidence Interval; BMI = Body Mass Index; SIMD = Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
  2. 1–Most deprived SIMD quintile (SIMD 1) compared to least deprived SIMD quintile (SIMD 5);
  3. 2–Frailty as indicated by a score of > 4 of the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale